- You are in:
- Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza
- KW PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ
- Polska
- Województwo Wielkopolskie
- Powiat Gnieźnieński
Powiat Gnieźnieński
| KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ | |
|---|---|
| Details | Data |
| Abbreviation of the name | KW PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ |
| Type of committee | Komitet wyborczy partii politycznej |
| Address | Nowogrodzka 84/86, 02-018 Warszawa |
| Election agent | Krzysztof Sobolewski |
| Financial agent | Teresa Schubert |
| Website | http://www.komitetwyborczy.pis.org.pl |
Rada Powiatu Gnieźnieńskiego
Registered candidates
| Details | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okręg nr 1 | 9 | 4 | 44.44 | 5 | 55.56 | 1 |
| Okręg nr 2 | 8 | 4 | 50.00 | 4 | 50.00 | 1 |
| Okręg nr 3 | 5 | 2 | 40.00 | 3 | 60.00 | 1 |
| Okręg nr 4 | 9 | 4 | 44.44 | 5 | 55.56 | 1 |
| Okręg nr 5 | 6 | 3 | 50.00 | 3 | 50.00 | 1 |
Age of candidates
| Details | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men | Oldest | Youngest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Okręg nr 1 | 52 | 51 | 52 | 78 | 37 |
| Okręg nr 2 | 60 | 60 | 59 | 74 | 24 |
| Okręg nr 3 | 58 | 58 | 58 | 69 | 47 |
| Okręg nr 4 | 53 | 52 | 53 | 70 | 28 |
| Okręg nr 5 | 48 | 42 | 53 | 63 | 28 |
Candidates list statistics
Registered lists
| Details | Number of | |
|---|---|---|
| lists | councils | |
| Lists registered for the councils of counties | 0.999999955 | 0.999999991 |
| Lists registered for the councils of communes over 20 000 inhabitants | 0.999999964 | 0.999999991 |
| Total | 0.999999919 | 0.999999982 |
Registered lists
| Details | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of candidates registered for the councils of counties | 0.9999996337 | 0.9999998317 | 0.999999540546% | 0.999999820 | 0.999999459554% |
| Number of candidates registered for the councils of communes over 20 000 inhabitants | 0.9999996931 | 0.9999998614 | 0.999999548445% | 0.9999998317 | 0.999999451655% |
| Number of candidates registered for the councils of commune under 20 000 inhabitants | 0.999999982 | 0.999999991 | 0.999999550% | 0.999999991 | 0.999999550% |
| Number of registered candidates for the head of the commune | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1% | 1.1 | 1.1% |
| Number of registered candidates for the mayor | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1% | 1.1 | 1.1% |
| Total | 0.9999992971 | 0.9999996832 | 0.999999549345% | 0.9999996139 | 0.999999450755% |
Average age of registered candidates
| Details | Average age | Average age of women | Average age of men |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average age of candidates for the councils of counties | 0.9999994654 | 0.9999994753 | 0.9999994555 |
| Average age of candidates submitted for the councils of communes over 20 000 inhabitants | 0.9999994753 | 0.999999550 | 0.9999994456 |
| Average age of candidates submitted for the councils of commune under 20 000 inhabitants | 0.9999996337 | 0.9999995644 | 0.999999730 |
| Average age of candidates for the head of the commune | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Average age of candidates for the mayor | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Total | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Registered candidates for councils grouped by age and gender
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-29 | 0.999999937 | 0.999999955 | 0.999999285771% | 0.999999982 | 0.999999714329% |
| 30-39 | 0.999999928 | 0.999999982 | 0.9999997525% | 0.999999946 | 0.9999992575% |
| 40-59 | 0.9999997327 | 0.9999998812 | 0.999999555644% | 0.9999998515 | 0.999999444456% |
| 60+ | 0.9999997228 | 0.9999998713 | 0.999999535746% | 0.9999998515 | 0.999999464354% |
| Total | 0.999999370 | 0.9999996832 | 0.999999542946% | 0.9999996238 | 0.999999457154% |
Registered candidates for the head of the commune, mayor, president of a twon grouped by age and gender
| Age | Number of candidates | Women | Women (%) | Men | Men (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-29 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 10% | 1.10 | 10% |
| 30-39 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 10% | 1.10 | 10% |
| 40-59 | 0.999999991 | 1.10 | 10% | 0.999999991 | 0.999999100% |
| 60+ | 1.10 | 1.10 | 10% | 1.10 | 10% |
| Total | 0.999999991 | 1.10 | 10% | 0.999999991 | 0.999999100% |
Elections to Rady Powiatu Gnieźnieńskiego
List No. 10 [ Constituency no. 1 ]
| Number in the list | Family name and given names | Age | Address | Number of valid votes cast for a candidate | % of valid votes | Mandate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAKOHOŃSKI Marcin Szymon | 39 | 1.1Mnichowo | 0.999986431 357 | 9.47% | Yes | |
| 2 | TWARDOWSKA Monika | 42 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999584416 | 2.90% | No | |
| 3 | SZALATY Natasza | 46 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.9999937630 | 4.40% | Yes | |
| 4 | ILNICKA Mariola | 59 | 1.1Osiniec | 0.99999709291 | 2.03% | No | |
| 5 | KANONICZAK Krzysztof Czesław | 60 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999842158 | 1.10% | No | |
| 6 | FAJFER Szymon | 42 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999766234 | 1.63% | No | |
| 7 | CIESIELSKA Aleksandra Ewa | 57 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999897103 | 0.72% | No | |
| 8 | KAPELIŃSKI Zygmunt | 78 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.9999984160 | 1.12% | No | |
| 9 | KUJAWSKI Piotr Andrzej | 37 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.9999949510 | 3.56% | No |
List No. 10 [ Constituency no. 2 ]
| Number in the list | Family name and given names | Age | Address | Number of valid votes cast for a candidate | % of valid votes | Mandate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TARCZYŃSKA Beata Józefa | 61 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.999985191 481 | 10.31% | Yes | |
| 2 | PIETRZAK Tadeusz | 66 | 1.1Dalki | 0.99999359641 | 4.46% | No | |
| 3 | JACHIMCZYK Ewa Maria | 61 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999445555 | 3.86% | No | |
| 4 | FISCHER Elżbieta Irena | 53 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999799201 | 1.40% | No | |
| 5 | ROMASZKIEWICZ Wojciech Rafał | 24 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.9999993862 | 0.43% | No | |
| 6 | BIELECKI Bogumił Kazimierz | 74 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.9999990595 | 0.66% | No | |
| 7 | KLAWITTER Jan Alojzy | 72 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.999999460 | 0.42% | No | |
| 8 | CHWIAŁKOWSKA-GRYGIEL Maria Krystyna | 63 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.99999832168 | 1.17% | No |
List No. 10 [ Constituency no. 3 ]
| Number in the list | Family name and given names | Age | Address | Number of valid votes cast for a candidate | % of valid votes | Mandate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FIGAJ Leszek Michał | 48 | 1.1Trzemeszno | 0.999989151 085 | 19.89% | Yes | |
| 2 | STACHOWIAK Zofia | 69 | 1.1Trzemeszno | 0.9999990793 | 1.70% | No | |
| 3 | BOGUSIEWICZ Wojciech | 56 | 1.1Wydartowo | 0.99999789211 | 3.87% | No | |
| 4 | HAJDUK Michał | 68 | 1.1Lubiń | 0.999999100 | 1.83% | No | |
| 5 | HUMAŃSKA Danuta Magdalena | 47 | 1.1Trzemeszno | 0.9999990991 | 1.67% | No |
List No. 10 [ Constituency no. 4 ]
| Number in the list | Family name and given names | Age | Address | Number of valid votes cast for a candidate | % of valid votes | Mandate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KWAPICH Andrzej Jan | 56 | 1.1Witkowo | 0.99998071 930 | 11.95% | Yes | |
| 2 | BRĘKLEWICZ Zbigniew Tadeusz | 58 | 1.1Marysin | 0.99999031969 | 6.00% | Yes | |
| 3 | PIETRZAK Lidia | 42 | 1.1Modliszewko | 0.99999666334 | 2.07% | No | |
| 4 | GRZYB Janusz | 67 | 1.1Gębarzewo | 0.99999736264 | 1.63% | No | |
| 5 | LEWANDOWSKI Wiesław Stanisław | 52 | 1.1Jankowo Dolne | 0.99999746254 | 1.57% | No | |
| 6 | KIEŁPIŃSKA-NOWAK Karolina Barbara | 28 | 1.1Dalki | 0.99999851149 | 0.92% | No | |
| 7 | ZDROJEWSKA Danuta Helena | 67 | 1.1Czechowo | 0.9999985150 | 0.93% | No | |
| 8 | PALUSZYŃSKA Marianna | 70 | 1.1Lubochnia | 0.9999995149 | 0.30% | No | |
| 9 | SIP Grzegorz | 31 | 1.1Ćwierdzin | 0.99999247753 | 4.66% | No |
List No. 10 [ Constituency no. 5 ]
| Number in the list | Family name and given names | Age | Address | Number of valid votes cast for a candidate | % of valid votes | Mandate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ŁYKOWSKI Maciej Adam | 63 | 1.1Gniezno | 0.999988151 185 | 13.24% | Yes | |
| 2 | PAWLICKI Jarosław Tomasz | 55 | 1.1Woźniki | 0.99999747253 | 2.83% | No | |
| 3 | SZAFRAN Aneta Maria | 28 | 1.1Rybno Wielkie | 0.99999834166 | 1.85% | No | |
| 4 | ZDROJEWSKA Joanna | 38 | 1.1Karniszewo | 0.99999794206 | 2.30% | No | |
| 5 | POWAŁOWSKI Marcin | 41 | 1.1Komorowo | 0.9999979210 | 2.35% | No | |
| 6 | NOWAK Jadwiga | 60 | 1.1Łubowo | 0.99999294706 | 7.89% | No |